Some Original Defence Rules

The place for threads about playing tactics/techniques/rules etc.
BlackpoolRock
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
Posts: 301
Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 15:54
Location: County Durham

Some Original Defence Rules

Postby BlackpoolRock » 21 Jul 2017, 11:42

Please could any Rules' historians explain the intention and interpretation of this one?

The Advanced Rules, possibly the earliest ones, from the 1950 Handbook contain this, under the heading, "Position of Defence . . ."

It goes on to say, "When the attack is in possession, two defending figures may be flicked into any position required, in order that they may intercept any passing movements of the attacking side...."

It does not say when these flicks are permitted, or whether they can, or must, be taken in the same turn.

Obviously these rules were designed for the longer game, played with flats, and at a more leisurely pace, than today's faster games, and I assume that when any flicks were requested, the attacking player would stop and allow them to be taken, before continuing. I would think it was therefore permissible, for the defender to wait until a shot was about to be taken before requesting two blocking flicks. Is this the reason for the introduction of the "Shooting" rule later on, as well as the regulated slots for defensive flicks in the later rules?

It's also interesting, (to me at any rate), that there was no "Organising" rule back then, so defensive positioning must have had to be very precise.

It would be good to know, especially from anyone who has seen or played games with these early rules, how they were applied, and worked.

User avatar
Gullseye
Grand Master
Posts: 2816
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 18:41

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby Gullseye » 21 Jul 2017, 16:47

Anyone who played by those rules would have to be at least in their 70's by now. I have all the old rule books and from reading the extract you refer to, I suspect that you could take the defensive flicks when you wished. In practice you would probably wait until an attacking flick was made and then respond. It does also go on to state that if you hit the ball when making the flick, the ball has to be replaced where it was to the advantage of the attacker and no further defensive flicks can be made during that attack.

The Shooting line was at first a suggestion in later rules to chalk a line across 11 inches from the goal line, before it was printed on later pitches.

BlackpoolRock
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
Posts: 301
Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 15:54
Location: County Durham

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby BlackpoolRock » 21 Jul 2017, 17:53

Thank you, Gullseye, for your reply. I realise that these rules are from way back, but I wondered if they may have been used in any more recent flats tournaments, or whether there may, still, be any enthusiasts who combine playing with the original playing figures with the original, (and purest?) rules of the game.

The replacement of ball, etc. and loss of remaining flicks for infringements was, of course, continued into the later editions when the Continental editions arrived on the market, which is where most of the current traditionalists, myself included, came in.

User avatar
Gullseye
Grand Master
Posts: 2816
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 18:41

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby Gullseye » 21 Jul 2017, 18:20

I've not heard of any tournaments going back to the original 1950's rules that are still playing now. Ralph would probably be the best person on here to answer as he plays tournaments and uses flats.

User avatar
Number9
Professional
Posts: 822
Joined: 16 Jun 2012, 13:35
Location: East Lancs
Contact:

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby Number9 » 23 Jul 2017, 09:28

I get the feeling that there was a struggle in the early formulation of the game to get a balance between attack and defence - this must have been a very early attempt. I personally believe that the early game was 'turn based' , but eventually youthful impatience and exuberance led to 'getting as many block flicks in as quickly as you can' to become the accepted way to play quite early - the earlier rules are not explicit about it, so it is open to interpretation.
I think turn-based play continued in Finland, but don't know if there are any tournaments played like that. I haven't heard of any in the UK
I have played the 50 minute game on a turn based approach with Mr R Claret in the past as an experiment - it was a leisurely affair and very much more like snooker in the atmosphere it engendered.
I use an adaptation of the early rules playing solo - as they are pre-adapted to it, and because I like having time to think about each flick.
http://www.pendlefalcon.com

The Traditional Subbuteo Society

We bring our preparation to the table, and opportunity may present itself, and if you are well prepared, you can seize opportunity and then maybe something good happens, and you call that luck.

Michael Mann

BlackpoolRock
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
ISF 2017-18 Subscriber
Posts: 301
Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 15:54
Location: County Durham

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby BlackpoolRock » 23 Jul 2017, 10:50

Thank you, Number9.

I also believe the turn-based play is best, even if not always taken alternately, with the phrases, "Take careful aim, do not hurry," symbolising what the game was all about.

On the occasions when I have played solo to seventies' rules, the 'house rule' was always that whenever a pass touched a player from the same team, the play was considered to have been very quick, so no defensive flick after that turn. It made a successful "long ball" tactic lethal, but it was simply an attempt to adapt turn-based play to the 'new' rules.

The reason I posted the question was whether the rulemakers may have envisaged the possibility of a defender, either through being permitted or simply opting, to take the two blocking flicks as the attacker was about to shoot, thus producing a hold-up in the game at the very time the drama should be unfolding quickly. Could this have led to the later modifications?

As you stated at the start, it's all about the balance between attack and defence, plus the pace and duration of the game.

ralphbfc
Forum Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: 24 Jun 2017, 06:57

Re: Some Original Defence Rules

Postby ralphbfc » 24 Jul 2017, 19:00

I've not heard of any tournaments going back to the original 1950's rules that are still playing now. Ralph would probably be the best person on here to answer as he plays tournaments and uses flats.
ETSA / ETF rules in flats events gents


Return to “Playing: Rules/Techniques/Tactics Section”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest